saavedra77: Back to the byte mines ... (sejanusstudious)
[personal profile] saavedra77
The below grew out of my reply to a post by Orangecone. I thought others might be interested:

Exit polls tracking Bush & Kerry voters' educational backgrounds show something that you may find surprising: the more highly educated voters were, the more likely they were to vote for the candidate who won their state.

Fellow "liberal elitists" please note: this is true of both blue & red states.

In California, for example, Bush did progressively worse, & Kerry better, at each higher level of educational attainment. Bush’s best showing was among the “No High School” cohort (58%), while Kerry did best among the “Post-Grad Study” group (64%). Much the same was true in New York and New Jersey.

But in Ohio it was Bush who did progressively better, & Kerry worse, at each higher level of educational attainment. Kerry's best showing was among those with "No High School" (58%), Bush's among the "Post-Grad Study" group (51%). Missouri and Nevada followed the same pattern.

What's the explanation? We may overestimate the benefits of advanced education for intellectual independence: Recent research at Emory University suggests that more highly-educated voters are both more ideological and more partisan, generally: "the correlation between liberal/conservative self-identification and party affiliation is lowest for high school-educated respondents, higher for those with some college and highest among college graduates.

Date: 2004-11-11 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saavedra77.livejournal.com
... You mean like a Master's from OSU isn't as good as one from Berkely? ;-)

Bad liberal elitist! Bad!

Profile

saavedra77: Back to the byte mines ... (Default)
Anthony Diaz

June 2018

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 08:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios